Workshop Report on Modeling the Southern Ocean Ecosystem

The following paragraphs represent the executive summary from a workshop report on discussions about Southern Ocean Ecosystem Modeling that occurred in January 1995. That meeting was collaboratively supported by the U.S. GLOBEC and U.S. JGOFS programs, in anticipation of upcoming field programs in the Southern Ocean by both programs. Mark Abbott (Oregon State University) chaired the workshop and compiled the report. The report of this workshop is being published jointly by the two programs. The report (No. 18 in the U.S. GLOBEC Report Series) is available in both html (on-line web viewing) and pdf (Adobe Acrobat) versions on the U.S. GLOBEC homepage at:

http://www.usglobec.berkeley.edu/usglobec/reports/reports.home.html

Executive Summary

A workshop was convened 16-18 January 1995 to discuss modeling of the Southern Ocean ecosystem. Attendees included both modelers and sea-going oceanographers as well as representatives of both the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) and Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics Experiment (GLOBEC). Both physical and biological oceanographers participated because of the strong links between physical forcing and biological processes in the Southern Ocean. Since this region is critical to global climate and biogeochemistry and because of the immense logistical difficulties in conducting field programs in the Southern Ocean, strong links must be developed and maintained between the modeling and observational communities.

Most numerical models of the upper ocean ecosystem are based on coupled partial differential equations with growth, loss, interaction, and diffusion terms. The basic model has been used in oceanography for many decades, although there have been many enhancements such as size classes, complex grazing and nutrient uptake terms, sophisticated mixed layer models, etc. As these models have grown in complexity, there are more adjustable parameters that must be estimated and more uncertainty about the exact forms of the parameterizations. Simple changes in parameters can have dramatic effects on model behavior. Several studies are investigating methods to reduce the number of parameters to those that capture most of the possible model behaviors.

As ocean models move towards a closer coupling with observations through data assimilation, it becomes essential that we know far more about the various parameters and functional forms than simply their mean and variance. Assimilation models require that we characterize the temporal and spatial variability of these parameters in order to fill in the gaps in time and space. This is a daunting task. For example, we know decorrelation scales of phytoplankton biomass in only a few locations in the world ocean; little is known about the decorrelation scales of phytoplankton growth rates.

Numerical models, including data assimilation models, also require experimental design and sampling strategies directed towards the specific questions being addressed. Much of the field data that have been used to provide model parameters and functional forms was gathered to solve specific scientific questions and hypotheses that are not always related to the questions being addressed by the model. For example, models of the relationship between chlorophyll concentration and diffuse attenuation may be based on field measurements from tropical waters, and it is not appropriate to apply such functional forms in models of high latitude processes.

The Southern Ocean will be the site of major field campaigns for both JGOFS and GLOBEC. There is still great uncertainty about the regulation of primary productivity in the Southern Ocean; iron limitation, grazing, and light limitation have been invoked. Near the ice edge, processes are even more complicated. Existing coupled biological/physical models must contend with a wide range of processes, many of which (such as iron limitation) have not yet been incorporated into existing models.

Given the expanse of the Southern Ocean and its isolation, field programs are by necessity both limited and costly. The upcoming JGOFS and GLOBEC Southern Ocean projects represent a unique opportunity to collect data on Southern Ocean biogeochemistry and ecological processes. Campaigns by other countries, including the United Kingdom, Australia, France, Germany, Japan, and South Africa, will also provide important data sets along with long-term studies such as the Palmer Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) program. It is unlikely we will be able to assemble these resources again. Given the predicted sensitivity of the Southern Ocean to climate change (and the resulting feedbacks), we must improve our ability to make predictions about the functioning of the Southern Ocean with only limited data sets in the future.

Physical forcing is particularly intense in the Southern Ocean. Strong wind forcing, large seasonal (and interannual) variations in ice cover, and mesoscale eddies are some of the processes that play critical roles in Southern Ocean dynamics. Weak stratification (relative to waters at lower latitudes) gives rise to short dynamical scales. The internal radius of deformation decreases towards the south, ranging from 20 km to 8 km. Bottom topography has a much stronger effect on the flow than at mid-latitudes because weak stratification allows bottom disturbances to penetrate to the surface. Coupled with the smaller dynamical scale, this means that small topographic features can have large-scale dynamical effects. This physical environment has strong links with biological processes that must be accounted for in both our field and modeling programs.

The focus of the workshop was an assessment of our present state of knowledge from both observations and models. We assessed where our greatest uncertainties lie and where small improvements in observation strategies and models would result in large increases in understanding. We estimated the time and space scales over which we can make useful predictions about the Southern Ocean. As part of this assessment, we explored the needs of the observational community in terms of models. We also sought to outline the type of measurement program that would lead to significantly improved models.

Workshop Recommendations

Increase accessibility to numerical models by observationalists. As observations become more sophisticated in terms of both the processes that can be measured and the scales that can be resolved (both microscales and global scales), models have assumed new importance as a framework within which data may be interpreted. Moreover, the increasing focus on studies of coupled biological/physical processes and the need for scientific research to focus on the prediction of ecosystem response to climate change has also elevated the role of numerical modeling. Thus the complexity of both models and observations require a much closer interaction between those who build and operate models and those who collect and analyze data.

  1. Encourage Southern Ocean JGOFS and GLOBEC activities that have both a modeling and a field component

  2. Develop a variety of models focusing on specific processes or hypotheses but with clearly defined interfaces and documented assumptions so that other researchers can understand and evaluate the models

  3. Archive output of numerical models much as field and satellite observations are archived and distributed

  4. Encourage the development of models that are structured as a set of testable hypotheses that can be addressed by appropriately designed sampling strategies
Improve modeling capabilities in advance of Southern Ocean field studies for use in designing sampling programs and analyzing data. Emerging research areas, such as data assimilation and nested models, would benefit by expanded research in advance of the JGOFS and GLOBEC field programs. Various diagnostic techniques, such as estimating advective fluxes, could be used to design specific sampling strategies at the Southern Ocean station sites.

  1. Encourage modelers to work with researchers participating in the Southern Ocean JGOFS and GLOBEC field studies

  2. Encourage development of data assimilation techniques for biogeochemical modeling

  3. Continue development of embedded or nested models which incorporate high resolution models within lower resolution models

  4. Use models to simulate advective fluxes around planned Southern Ocean stations and compare with observations as part of model diagnostics.
Improve observing capabilities to take advantage of and test numerical models. Present models point towards the need for better estimates of rate parameters as well as more detailed information on size and functional classes in the plankton community. Improvements in data assimilation techniques will require better estimates of the error fields associated with the assimilated data sets. Efforts should be placed towards the development of low-cost sensors to extend the scales that can be observed.

  1. Evaluate present JGOFS core observations in context of the needs of existing numerical models

  2. Develop models that resolve critical time and space scales as identified in field measurements

  3. Collect information on size and functional groups

  4. Quantify error covariances for data fields that are assimilated into models

  5. Continue to encourage the development of new automated and low-cost sensors to extend sampling coverage of the Southern Ocean
Establish a regular program to further the development of coupled physical/biogeochemical models. Models of the Southern Ocean ecosystem must resolve complex physical dynamics as well as complicated chemical and biological interactions. Because of the nature of the circulation in this vast region of the ocean, these models must have high spatial resolution as well. Our overall goal should be the development of a closer alliance between models (which will always be gross simplifications of reality) and observations (which will always provide a biased and undersampled view of reality). We should continue activities that strengthen the links between these two complementary ways of looking at a complex system.

  1. Regularly assess the state of our knowledge and modeling capabilities

  2. Support annual workshops where models can be run and evaluated by both modelers and observationalists.
(Mark Abbott is a Professor of Biological Oceanography at Oregon State University.)